Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] epoll: fix race between ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) and" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 09/04, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.

conflict with commit 2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921
"sched/wait: Disambiguate wq_entry->task_list and wq_head->task_list naming"
and commit df0108c5da561c66c333bb46bfe3c1fc65905898
"epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag"

> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From 138e4ad67afd5c6c318b056b4d17c17f2c0ca5c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 18:55:33 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] epoll: fix race between ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) and
>  ep_free()/ep_remove()


>From f1030abcfd950e97e6aacea2841b270d4228e19c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 18:55:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] epoll: fix race between ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) and
 ep_free()/ep_remove()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The race was introduced by me in commit 971316f0503a ("epoll:
ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead").  I did not
realize that nothing can protect eventpoll after ep_poll_callback() sets
->whead = NULL, only whead->lock can save us from the race with
ep_free() or ep_remove().

Move ->whead = NULL to the end of ep_poll_callback() and add the
necessary barriers.

TODO: cleanup the ewake/EPOLLEXCLUSIVE logic, it was confusing even
before this patch.

Hopefully this explains use-after-free reported by syzcaller:

	BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in debug_spin_lock_before
	...
	 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
	 ep_poll_callback+0x29f/0xff0 fs/eventpoll.c:1148

this is spin_lock(eventpoll->lock),

	...
	Freed by task 17774:
	...
	 kfree+0xe8/0x2c0 mm/slub.c:3883
	 ep_free+0x22c/0x2a0 fs/eventpoll.c:865

Fixes: 971316f0503a ("epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead")
Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@126.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/eventpoll.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 1e009ca..1b08556 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -518,8 +518,13 @@ static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
 	wait_queue_head_t *whead;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	/* If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe */
-	whead = rcu_dereference(pwq->whead);
+	/*
+	 * If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe.
+	 * If we read NULL we need a barrier paired with
+	 * smp_store_release() in ep_poll_callback(), otherwise
+	 * we rely on whead->lock.
+	 */
+	whead = smp_load_acquire(&pwq->whead);
 	if (whead)
 		remove_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1003,17 +1008,6 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
 	struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_wait(wait);
 	struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
 
-	if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
-		ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead = NULL;
-		/*
-		 * whead = NULL above can race with ep_remove_wait_queue()
-		 * which can do another remove_wait_queue() after us, so we
-		 * can't use __remove_wait_queue(). whead->lock is held by
-		 * the caller.
-		 */
-		list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
-	}
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -1078,6 +1072,23 @@ out_unlock:
 	if (pwake)
 		ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
 
+
+	if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
+		/*
+		 * If we race with ep_remove_wait_queue() it can miss
+		 * ->whead = NULL and do another remove_wait_queue() after
+		 * us, so we can't use __remove_wait_queue().
+		 */
+		list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
+		/*
+		 * ->whead != NULL protects us from the race with ep_free()
+		 * or ep_remove(), ep_remove_wait_queue() takes whead->lock
+		 * held by the caller. Once we nullify it, nothing protects
+		 * ep/epi or even wait.
+		 */
+		smp_store_release(&ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead, NULL);
+	}
+
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0