From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:44:57 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, me@tobin.cc,
        idosch@mellanox.com, Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        1715609@bugs.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][4.13.y][4.14.y][v4.15.y] net: reduce
 skb_warn_bad_offload() noise
Message-ID: <20171211214457.GA28858@kroah.com>
References: <0a352e7b-0404-2f91-206f-099e2376ab9a@canonical.com>
 <CAF=yD-L_S312Ryyg5fE3p6kqFus4SKQcgL2zXKiofq-ohiK7bg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-L_S312Ryyg5fE3p6kqFus4SKQcgL2zXKiofq-ohiK7bg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:25:26PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Note that UFO was removed in 4.14 and that skb_warn_bad_offload
> can happen for various types of packets, so there may be multiple
> independent bug reports. I'm investigating two other non-UFO reports
> just now.

Meta-comment, now that UFO is gone from mainline, I'm wondering if I
should just delete it from 4.4 and 4.9 as well.  Any objections for
that?  I'd like to make it easy to maintain these kernels for a while,
and having them diverge like this, with all of the issues around UFO,
seems like it will just make life harder for myself if I leave it in.

Any opinions?

thanks,

greg k-h