* Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
@ 2017-12-14 22:27 Guenter Roeck
2017-12-15 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2017-12-14 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable
Hi,
I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
2017-12-14 22:27 Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue Guenter Roeck
@ 2017-12-15 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-12-15 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: stable
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
>
> when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
>
> This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
figure this out...
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
2017-12-15 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2017-12-15 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-12-15 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: stable
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> > implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
> >
> > when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
> >
> > This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
>
> Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
> conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
> cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
> figure this out...
Ah, it passes powerpc builds on 0-day with the 'allnoconfig' build
option, not with the defconfig, that explains that.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
2017-12-15 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2017-12-15 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-12-15 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: stable
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
> > >
> > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> > > implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
> > >
> > > when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
> > >
> > > This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
> >
> > Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
> > conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
> > cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
> > figure this out...
>
> Ah, it passes powerpc builds on 0-day with the 'allnoconfig' build
> option, not with the defconfig, that explains that.
And the patch I tried to apply to fix this up didn't apply in the right
place, which is the problem here, let me go fix it now...
thanks for letting me know about this,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
2017-12-15 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2017-12-15 7:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-12-15 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: stable
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:46:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
> > > >
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> > > > implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
> > > >
> > > > when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
> > > >
> > > > This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
> > > conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
> > > cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
> > > figure this out...
> >
> > Ah, it passes powerpc builds on 0-day with the 'allnoconfig' build
> > option, not with the defconfig, that explains that.
>
> And the patch I tried to apply to fix this up didn't apply in the right
> place, which is the problem here, let me go fix it now...
>
> thanks for letting me know about this,
Ugh, this was bad. Turns out that for the last release of 4.9 and 4.14,
the last 5 or so patches never got applied when I created the git tree.
They both stopped at the same place in the patch series, which is odd,
but at least it means that they failed in the same way.
This was only caught because this fixup really never made it into the
released 4.9 tree. Thanks for this, I'll go reapply the patches that
didn't make it into the 4.9 and 4.14 queues.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
2017-12-15 7:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2017-12-15 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-12-15 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: stable
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:53:38AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:46:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> > > > > implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
> > > > >
> > > > > when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
> > > > >
> > > > > This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
> > > > conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
> > > > cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
> > > > figure this out...
> > >
> > > Ah, it passes powerpc builds on 0-day with the 'allnoconfig' build
> > > option, not with the defconfig, that explains that.
> >
> > And the patch I tried to apply to fix this up didn't apply in the right
> > place, which is the problem here, let me go fix it now...
> >
> > thanks for letting me know about this,
>
> Ugh, this was bad. Turns out that for the last release of 4.9 and 4.14,
> the last 5 or so patches never got applied when I created the git tree.
> They both stopped at the same place in the patch series, which is odd,
> but at least it means that they failed in the same way.
And now I know why. They failed on the patch that modified the main
kernel Makefile, which makes sense as I hand-edit it to bump the version
number, so it was "dirty" and git would complain and stop applying
patches there.
I've "semi-scripted" the release process in the past few weeks, so an
error like this would not be caught, previously I would have noticed the
error as I applied the patches "by hand". I'll go fix up my scripts to
not do this, and I'll go verify that I haven't dropped any other patches
like this recently either.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-15 8:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-14 22:27 Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue Guenter Roeck
2017-12-15 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).