From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:53:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171215075338.GA25895@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171215074613.GA22222@kroah.com>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:46:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:27:41PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I thought the problem was fixed, but I still see:
> > > >
> > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/checksum.h:103:2: error:
> > > > implicit declaration of function 'from64to32'
> > > >
> > > > when building powerpc images (eg powerpc:defconfig).
> > > >
> > > > This is with v4.9.69-20-g78542f2. v4.9.69 fails as well.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I thought I took care of that already too. I'm getting
> > > conflicting reports from 0-day about this as well, it failed one build
> > > cycle, then passed the next, and now failed again. Ugh, let me try to
> > > figure this out...
> >
> > Ah, it passes powerpc builds on 0-day with the 'allnoconfig' build
> > option, not with the defconfig, that explains that.
>
> And the patch I tried to apply to fix this up didn't apply in the right
> place, which is the problem here, let me go fix it now...
>
> thanks for letting me know about this,
Ugh, this was bad. Turns out that for the last release of 4.9 and 4.14,
the last 5 or so patches never got applied when I created the git tree.
They both stopped at the same place in the patch series, which is odd,
but at least it means that they failed in the same way.
This was only caught because this fixup really never made it into the
released 4.9 tree. Thanks for this, I'll go reapply the patches that
didn't make it into the 4.9 and 4.14 queues.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-15 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-14 22:27 Build failures in linux-4.9.y-stable-queue Guenter Roeck
2017-12-15 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-15 7:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-12-15 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171215075338.GA25895@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).