From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Linux Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:30:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108223049.GA28743@fury> (raw)
commit 98b8e4e5c17bf87c1b18ed929472051dab39878c upstream
Please apply to 4.9.x and later stable kernel trees (this is as far back
as 86d9f48534e8 was applied).
This submission should have followed Option 1, but I failed to Cc:
stable in the original commit.
Calling acpi_wmi_init() at the subsys_initcall() level causes ordering
issues to appear on some systems and they are difficult to reproduce,
because there is no guaranteed ordering between subsys_initcall()
calls, so they may occur in different orders on different systems.
In particular, commit 86d9f48534e8 (mm/slab: fix kmemcg cache
creation delayed issue) exposed one of these issues where genl_init()
and acpi_wmi_init() are both called at the same initcall level, but
the former must run before the latter so as to avoid a NULL pointer
dereference.
For this reason, move the acpi_wmi_init() invocation to the
initcall_sync level which should still be early enough for things
to work correctly in the WMI land.
Link: https://marc.info/?t=151274596700002&r=1&w=2
Reported-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
---
drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
index 791449a..daa68ac 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -1458,5 +1458,5 @@ static void __exit acpi_wmi_exit(void)
class_unregister(&wmi_bus_class);
}
-subsys_initcall(acpi_wmi_init);
+subsys_initcall_sync(acpi_wmi_init);
module_exit(acpi_wmi_exit);
--
2.9.4
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-08 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 22:30 Darren Hart [this message]
2018-01-10 12:18 ` [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180108223049.GA28743@fury \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=noodles@earth.li \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).