From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58640 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758475AbeAIOoC (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:44:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:44:04 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Pradeep Sawlani Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Marc Zyngier , Christoffer Dall , Wanpeng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in write_mmio Message-ID: <20180109144404.GA13228@kroah.com> References: <20180109141527.218444-1-sawlani@google.com> <20180109142545.GA20221@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 06:28:29AM -0800, Pradeep Sawlani wrote: > 4.4.110 stable tree. What about 4.9 and 4.14? You do not want to cause a regression if someone moves from 4.4.y to 4.9.y, right? > bwh was internal thing which got here. Do you want me to modify commit > message and send it across? It makes no sense in the context, the person who did the work should sign-off on the patch, right? thanks, greg k-h