From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55146 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750876AbeAUJhn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 04:37:43 -0500
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:37:41 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use __nostackprotect for sme_encrypt_kernel
Message-ID: <20180121093741.GA5010@kroah.com>
References: <b7a8e990-9d1d-39b2-671d-a44d5647dbec@amd.com>
 <20180121011402.9557-1-labbott@redhat.com>
 <CA+55aFz+gy50ZqrZm=L5oU3qgC8QTtEyXN+NjnqOKfqZxU1f8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5585e5d7-2b9d-85b8-59be-7e6fd79bb33f@gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFxZshQJweUz4cDeSap9cqCL5RB55BmcGqsBs3=ZOJpeGw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxZshQJweUz4cDeSap9cqCL5RB55BmcGqsBs3=ZOJpeGw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:16:31PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Added stable to CC since the patch series this patch fixes
> > is in stable-queue.
> 
> Oh, it wasn't clear from the commit message. But I guess the "Fixes:"
> tag would have caught Greg's eye regardless.

Ugh, I am _so_ behind in looking at patches that only have a Fixes: tag
in it and not a "Cc: stable@" tag, due to the recent high-volume of the
latter.

But they will end up in a mbox that I need to dig out of eventually, but
it will take time, so if you know you want a patch in a stable release,
it's much easier to just use the "Cc: stable@" tag please.

thanks,

greg k-h