From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4] vsyscall: Fix permissions for emulate mode with KAISER/PTI
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:13:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180128121300.GA26619@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1801261139040.1738@eggly.anvils>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:23:17PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I haven't updated those 3.18 patches since that time, and was a day or
> two away from asking you, Greg, what is the status of 3.18? I didn't
> bother to update those patches because I saw it marked EOL as soon as
> Meltdown+Spectre was announced; yet it now appears to have a life
> beyond death, getting non-Meltdown+Spectre updates every week or so.
I am not doing any Meltdown/Spectre patches for 3.18, because yes, it
really is EOL. I am only continuing to maintain it because there are
some vendors that rely on it at the moment, and they usually just take
these releases + the android-common kernel tree together. As the needed
ARM Meltdown patches are in the android-common tree right now (and not
really anywhere else at all), that is sufficient for their use.
> I can certainly (but not until next week) put together a 3.18.92-
> based tarfile or tarfiles, equivalent to what I sent for 3.8 and 3.10
> (on kaiser-discuss backports list) a couple of days ago. That is, like
> what I sent before for 3.18.72, but with all the fixups and pti= boot
> option and KAISER->PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION renaming that's come in since
> (But I cannot bear to go further myself, into retpoline etc, sorry.)
>
> Would a 3.18 Kaiser update be helpful, or are you preferring to force
> people off 3.18 by not providing those updates? Or preferring to wait
> a bit longer, until 4.4 and 4.9 and 4.14 have settled down?
I'm not recommending anyone use the 3.18 tree unless they know what they
are doing right now :)
And yes, I would love for them to move off of that tree as soon as
possible, but usually due to huge out-of-tree SoC patches, they can not
do that easily, if at all, right now.
So no need for a 3.18 Kaiser update for me at all, I do not need or want
it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-28 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-26 16:23 [PATCH 4.4] vsyscall: Fix permissions for emulate mode with KAISER/PTI Ben Hutchings
2018-01-26 16:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-26 20:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-01-28 12:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-01-28 20:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-01-26 16:38 ` Patch "vsyscall: Fix permissions for emulate mode with KAISER/PTI" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-26 16:38 ` Patch "vsyscall: Fix permissions for emulate mode with KAISER/PTI" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180128121300.GA26619@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox