From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.14 6/6] bpf, arm64: fix stack_depth tracking in combination with tail calls
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:36:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180128233647.21154-7-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180128233647.21154-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>
[ upstream commit a2284d912bfc865cdca4c00488e08a3550f9a405 ]
Using dynamic stack_depth tracking in arm64 JIT is currently broken in
combination with tail calls. In prologue, we cache ctx->stack_size and
adjust SP reg for setting up function call stack, and tearing it down
again in epilogue. Problem is that when doing a tail call, the cached
ctx->stack_size might not be the same.
One way to fix the problem with minimal overhead is to re-adjust SP in
emit_bpf_tail_call() and properly adjust it to the current program's
ctx->stack_size. Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8.
Fixes: f1c9eed7f437 ("bpf, arm64: take advantage of stack_depth tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index ba38d40..bb32f7f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ static inline int epilogue_offset(const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* Stack must be multiples of 16B */
#define STACK_ALIGN(sz) (((sz) + 15) & ~15)
-#define PROLOGUE_OFFSET 8
+/* Tail call offset to jump into */
+#define PROLOGUE_OFFSET 7
static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
@@ -200,19 +201,19 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* Initialize tail_call_cnt */
emit(A64_MOVZ(1, tcc, 0, 0), ctx);
- /* 4 byte extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
- ctx->stack_size = prog->aux->stack_depth + 4;
- ctx->stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(ctx->stack_size);
-
- /* Set up function call stack */
- emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
-
cur_offset = ctx->idx - idx0;
if (cur_offset != PROLOGUE_OFFSET) {
pr_err_once("PROLOGUE_OFFSET = %d, expected %d!\n",
cur_offset, PROLOGUE_OFFSET);
return -1;
}
+
+ /* 4 byte extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
+ ctx->stack_size = prog->aux->stack_depth + 4;
+ ctx->stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(ctx->stack_size);
+
+ /* Set up function call stack */
+ emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
return 0;
}
@@ -260,11 +261,12 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_LDR64(prg, tmp, prg), ctx);
emit(A64_CBZ(1, prg, jmp_offset), ctx);
- /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */
+ /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_offset); */
off = offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func);
emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, off, ctx);
emit(A64_LDR64(tmp, prg, tmp), ctx);
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tmp, tmp, sizeof(u32) * PROLOGUE_OFFSET), ctx);
+ emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
emit(A64_BR(tmp), ctx);
/* out: */
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-28 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-28 23:36 [PATCH stable 4.14 0/6] BPF stable patches Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-28 23:36 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 1/6] bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-28 23:36 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 2/6] bpf: avoid false sharing of map refcount with max_entries Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf: avoid false sharing of map refcount with max_entries" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-28 23:36 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 3/6] bpf: fix divides by zero Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf: fix divides by zero" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-28 23:36 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 4/6] bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-28 23:36 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 5/6] bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-28 23:36 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-01-29 12:20 ` Patch "bpf, arm64: fix stack_depth tracking in combination with tail calls" " gregkh
2018-01-29 12:21 ` [PATCH stable 4.14 0/6] BPF stable patches Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180128233647.21154-7-daniel@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).