From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49468 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751140AbeBINlx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 08:41:53 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse , Andrea Arcangeli , Andi Kleen , Ashok Raj , Jun Nakajima , David Woodhouse , Linus Torvalds , rga@amazon.de, Dave Hansen , Asit Mallick , Andy Lutomirski , Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Paolo Bonzini , Dan Williams , Arjan Van De Ven , Tim Chen Subject: [PATCH 4.9 36/92] KVM: x86: Make indirect calls in emulator speculation safe Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:39:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20180209133933.771072983@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra (cherry picked from commit 1a29b5b7f347a1a9230c1e0af5b37e3e571588ab) Replace the indirect calls with CALL_NOSPEC. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Ashok Raj Cc: Greg KH Cc: Jun Nakajima Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: rga@amazon.de Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Asit Mallick Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Jason Baron Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Arjan Van De Ven Cc: Tim Chen Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180125095843.595615683@infradead.org [dwmw2: Use ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT like upstream, now we have it] Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "x86.h" #include "tss.h" @@ -1012,8 +1013,8 @@ static __always_inline u8 test_cc(unsign void (*fop)(void) = (void *)em_setcc + 4 * (condition & 0xf); flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF; - asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]" - : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags)); + asm("push %[flags]; popf; " CALL_NOSPEC + : "=a"(rc) : [thunk_target]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags)); return rc; } @@ -5306,15 +5307,14 @@ static void fetch_possible_mmx_operand(s static int fastop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void (*fop)(struct fastop *)) { - register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP); ulong flags = (ctxt->eflags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF; if (!(ctxt->d & ByteOp)) fop += __ffs(ctxt->dst.bytes) * FASTOP_SIZE; - asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]; pushf; pop %[flags]\n" + asm("push %[flags]; popf; " CALL_NOSPEC " ; pushf; pop %[flags]\n" : "+a"(ctxt->dst.val), "+d"(ctxt->src.val), [flags]"+D"(flags), - [fastop]"+S"(fop), "+r"(__sp) + [thunk_target]"+S"(fop), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT : "c"(ctxt->src2.val)); ctxt->eflags = (ctxt->eflags & ~EFLAGS_MASK) | (flags & EFLAGS_MASK);