* Re: [stable-4.4.y] compile error with KAISER and no vsyscall emulation
[not found] <3d9557f8-5752-4993-f32a-64335348069f@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
@ 2018-02-11 0:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-02-13 15:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2018-02-11 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Jakobi; +Cc: ben.hutchings, bp, hughd, Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2634 bytes --]
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed a compile error with a recent version (4.4.115) of the 4.4.y branch:
> arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c: In function ‘kaiser_init’:
> arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c:348:8: error: ‘vsyscall_pgprot’ undeclared (first use in
> this function)
>
> It seems like my combination of kernel options doesn't work for KAISER.
> X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION is not set on my system, while LEGACY_VSYSCALL is set to
> NONE (LEGACY_VSYSCALL_NONE=y). I have managed to get things compiling again, by
> moving the 'extern unsigned long vsyscall_pgprot' outside of the preprocessor
> statement. This works for me, I guess because the code in question is never
> called during runtime anyway (vsyscall_enabled() always returns false).
>
> With best wishes,
> Tobias
Yes, sorry about that, thanks Tobias. Same error on 4.9 too.
Here's the patch that you correctly suggest, and it's good for both:
[PATCH 4.4 and 4.9] kaiser: fix compile error without vsyscall
Tobias noticed a compile error on 4.4.115, and it's the same on 4.9.80:
arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c: In function ‘kaiser_init’:
arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c:348:8: error: ‘vsyscall_pgprot’ undeclared
(first use in this function)
It seems like his combination of kernel options doesn't work for KAISER.
X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION is not set on his system, while LEGACY_VSYSCALL
is set to NONE (LEGACY_VSYSCALL_NONE=y). He managed to get things
compiling again, by moving the 'extern unsigned long vsyscall_pgprot'
outside of the preprocessor statement. This works because the optimizer
removes that code (vsyscall_enabled() is always false) - and that's how
it was done in some older backports.
Reported-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ extern void map_vsyscall(void);
*/
extern bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address);
extern bool vsyscall_enabled(void);
-extern unsigned long vsyscall_pgprot;
#else
static inline void map_vsyscall(void) {}
static inline bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
@@ -22,5 +21,6 @@ static inline bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
}
static inline bool vsyscall_enabled(void) { return false; }
#endif
+extern unsigned long vsyscall_pgprot;
#endif /* _ASM_X86_VSYSCALL_H */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread