From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44786 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S965194AbeBMQgE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:36:04 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:32:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@gmail.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ak@linux.intel.com,
        ashok.raj@intel.com, karahmed@amazon.de,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, pbonzini@redhat.com,
        tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 43/92] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are
 not vulnerable to Meltdown
Message-ID: <20180213163239.GA17101@kroah.com>
References: <20180209133931.211869118@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20180209133934.259299920@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CADSoG1tjU2G9FUNOFod4ZsYSw7gOSsza_JWUv5H6pAkbftWywA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180213150007.GJ26982@kroah.com>
 <b0680083-5cd2-e152-0d64-f5a931274a8e@linux.intel.com>
 <CADSoG1sv4-YmRh8AwD7A93_eDLn4ZTwD0Y7C9jyRyh6nOvwqjQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADSoG1sv4-YmRh8AwD7A93_eDLn4ZTwD0Y7C9jyRyh6nOvwqjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:27:47PM +0000, Nick Lowe wrote:
> Hi Arjan and Greg,
> 
> Sorry if I am not being clear enough.
> 
> My point is that there is a check for X86_VENDOR_AMD now in two places.
> 
> It is still hardcoded for the auto boot option which I think should
> not be there. The patch on that basis looked incomplete to me.
> 
> Put another way, there is no effect to the auto option where the
> contents of cpu_no_meltdown[] are changed and
> cpu_vulnerable_to_meltdown returns differently.
> 
> The auto option does not make use of a determination of the
> X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN state.
> 
> This seems wrong to me. It does not seem correct to me for the auto
> option to have this duplication with a check for just X86_VENDOR_AMD.

Do you have a patch that reflects what you want to see changed here?

And can you test it?  :)

I don't have any AMD hardware, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h