From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43622 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151AbeBOKXk (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 05:23:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:23:41 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Voegtle Cc: David Woodhouse , Paolo Bonzini , Jim Mattson , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, KarimAllah Ahmed , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [STABLE 4.9.y PATCH 0/9] Backport of KVM Speculation Control support Message-ID: <20180215102341.GA19398@kroah.com> References: <1517938181-15317-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:15:41AM +0100, Thomas Voegtle wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > I've put together a linux-4.9.y branch at > > http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y > > > Are there any plans for a backport to v4.4? > > I would volunteer for testing ;) Care to volunteer to do the backport? :) Why do you need/want this type of thing for 4.4.y? What is keeping you from moving to 4.9.y instead? Or even better yet, 4.14.y or 4.15, where everything is fixed "correctly"? thanks, greg k-h