From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:41108 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757285AbeBPCpN (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:45:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:45:08 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/108] 4.4.116-stable review Message-ID: <20180216024508.GA18379@flashbox> References: <20180215151222.267507937@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180215151222.267507937@linuxfoundation.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:15:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.116 release. > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat Feb 17 15:11:36 UTC 2018. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.116-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Merged, compiled, and flashed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5. The v4l2-ioctl32 commits were interesting to sift through merging... I think I got everything correct though, the changes are in my trees under temporary tags if anyone cares to check them out: https://github.com/nathanchance/wahoo/commits/queue-2.17 https://github.com/nathanchance/op5/commits/queue-3.10 So far, there have been no visible regressions in dmesg or general usage (I focused pretty heavily in the video area since those were the biggest changes). Thanks! Nathan