From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42790 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965384AbeBUNJM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:09:12 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH 4.15 080/163] nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:48:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20180221124534.867810766@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180221124529.931834518@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180221124529.931834518@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Will Deacon commit 8fa80c503b484ddc1abbd10c7cb2ab81f3824a50 upstream. For architectures providing their own implementation of array_index_mask_nospec() in asm/barrier.h, attempting to use WARN_ONCE() to complain about out-of-range parameters using WARN_ON() results in a mess of mutually-dependent include files. Rather than unpick the dependencies, simply have the core code in nospec.h perform the checking for us. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517840166-15399-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/nospec.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/nospec.h +++ b/include/linux/nospec.h @@ -20,20 +20,6 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_ unsigned long size) { /* - * Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage. - * - * Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the - * sign bit of @index is taken into account when generating the - * mask. - * - * This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that - * @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX. - */ - if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, - "array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) - return 0; - - /* * Always calculate and emit the mask even if the compiler * thinks the mask is not needed. The compiler does not take * into account the value of @index under speculation. @@ -44,6 +30,26 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_ #endif /* + * Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage. + * + * Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the + * sign bit of @index is taken into account when generating the + * mask. + * + * This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that + * @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX. + */ +#define array_index_mask_nospec_check(index, size) \ +({ \ + if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, \ + "array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) \ + _mask = 0; \ + else \ + _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(index, size); \ + _mask; \ +}) + +/* * array_index_nospec - sanitize an array index after a bounds check * * For a code sequence like: @@ -61,7 +67,7 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_ ({ \ typeof(index) _i = (index); \ typeof(size) _s = (size); \ - unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(_i, _s); \ + unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec_check(_i, _s); \ \ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_i) > sizeof(long)); \ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_s) > sizeof(long)); \