From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53872 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031949AbeCAP0H (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:26:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:26:06 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Michael Ellerman , Sasha Levin Cc: danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mdeng@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "powerpc/pseries: Make RAS IRQ explicitly dependent on DLPAR WQ" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree Message-ID: <20180301152606.GA4257@kroah.com> References: <1519831619145229@kroah.com> <87o9k88olg.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o9k88olg.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:24:43PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > writes: > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > powerpc/pseries: Make RAS IRQ explicitly dependent on DLPAR WQ > > > > to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > powerpc-pseries-make-ras-irq-explicitly-dependent-on-dlpar-wq.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let know about it. > > Did someone request this one? Sasha did (his email now fixed...) > I didn't Cc it to stable because I wasn't confident of the testing it'd > had, and in fact we found another related bug recently. > > So if you take this you probably also want: > > c9dccf1d074a ("powerpc/pseries: Enable RAS hotplug events later") > > > But note that commit is only ~2-3 weeks old, so again I can't vouch 100% > for it's bullet-proof-ness. So do you want me to drop this one, or take both? I can do either, it's up to you... thanks, greg k-h