From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, fweimer@redhat.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15] powerpc/64s/radix: Boot-time NULL pointer protection using a guard-PID
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:33:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307173312.GL7097@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520029841-30324-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:30:41PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
> commit eeb715c3e995fbdda0cc05e61216c6c5609bce66 upstream
>
> This change restores and formalises the behaviour that access to NULL
> or other user addresses by the kernel during boot should fault rather
> than succeed and modify memory. This was inadvertently broken when
> fixing another bug, because it was previously not well defined and
> only worked by chance.
>
> powerpc/64s/radix uses high address bits to select an address space
> "quadrant", which determines which PID and LPID are used to translate
> the rest of the address (effective PID, effective LPID). The kernel
> mapping at 0xC... selects quadrant 3, which uses PID=0 and LPID=0. So
> the kernel page tables are installed in the PID 0 process table entry.
>
> An address at 0x0... selects quadrant 0, which uses PID=PIDR for
> translating the rest of the address (that is, it uses the value of the
> PIDR register as the effective PID). If PIDR=0, then the translation
> is performed with the PID 0 process table entry page tables. This is
> the kernel mapping, so we effectively get another copy of the kernel
> address space at 0. A NULL pointer access will access physical memory
> address 0.
>
> To prevent duplicating the kernel address space in quadrant 0, this
> patch allocates a guard PID containing no translations, and
> initializes PIDR with this during boot, before the MMU is switched on.
> Any kernel access to quadrant 0 will use this guard PID for
> translation and find no valid mappings, and therefore fault.
>
> After boot, this PID will be switchd away to user context PIDs, but
> those contain user mappings (and usually NULL pointer protection)
> rather than kernel mapping, which is much safer (and by design). It
> may be in future this is tightened further, which the guard PID could
> be used for.
>
> Commit 371b8044 ("powerpc/64s: Initialize ISAv3 MMU registers before
> setting partition table"), introduced this problem because it zeroes
> PIDR at boot. However previously the value was inherited from firmware
> or kexec, which is not robust and can be zero (e.g., mambo).
>
> Fixes: 371b80447ff3 ("powerpc/64s: Initialize ISAv3 MMU registers before setting partition table")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+
> Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> [mauricfo: backport to v4.15.7 (context line updates only) and re-test]
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-radix.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Now applied, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 16:25 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] powerpc/64s/radix: Boot-time NULL pointer protection using a" failed to apply to 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-02 22:30 ` [PATCH 4.15] powerpc/64s/radix: Boot-time NULL pointer protection using a guard-PID Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2018-03-03 9:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-03-07 17:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180307173312.GL7097@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox