Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Fix failed request error code
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:57:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180404085730.2df015c3@pentland.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180404065138.25534-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>

On Wed,  4 Apr 2018 15:51:38 +0900
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> wrote:

> With the introduction of commit e39a97353e53 ("scsi: core: return
> BLK_STS_OK for DID_OK in __scsi_error_from_host_byte()"), a command
> that failed with hostbyte=DID_OK and driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE but
> lacking additional sense information will have a return code set to
> BLK_STS_OK. This results in the request issuer to see successful
> request execution despite the failure. An example of such case is an
> unaligned write on a host managed ZAC disk connected to a SAS HBA
> with a malfunctioning SAT. The unaligned write command gets aborted
> but has no additional sense information.
> 
> sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] tag#3905 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK
> driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] tag#3905 Sense Key :
> Aborted Command [current] sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] tag#3905 Add. Sense: No
> additional sense information sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] tag#3905 CDB:
> Write(16) 8a 00 00 00 00 00 02 0c 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00
> print_req_error: I/O error, dev sde, sector 274726920
> 
> In scsi_io_completion(), sense key handling to not change the request
> error code and success being reported to the issuer.
> 
> Fix this by making sure that the error code always indicates an error
> if scsi_io_completion() decide that the action to be taken for a
> failed command is to not retry it and terminate it immediately
> (ACTION_FAIL) .
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> Fixes: e39a97353e53 ("scsi: core: return BLK_STS_OK for DID_OK in
> __scsi_error_from_host_byte()") Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index c84f931388f2..87579bfcc186 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1002,6 +1002,15 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> unsigned int good_bytes) scsi_print_command(cmd);
>  			}
>  		}
> +		/*
> +		 * The command failed and should not be retried. If
> the host
> +		 * byte is DID_OK, then
> __scsi_error_from_host_byte() returned
> +		 * BLK_STS_OK and error indicates a success. Make
> sure to not
> +		 * use that as the completion code and always return
> an
> +		 * I/O error.
> +		 */
> +		if (error == BLK_STS_OK)
> +			error = BLK_STS_IOERR;
>  		if (!scsi_end_request(req, error,
> blk_rq_err_bytes(req), 0)) return;
>  		/*FALLTHRU*/

That looks wrong.
Shouldn't __scsi_error_from_host_byte() return the correct status here?

Cheers,

Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-04  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-04  6:51 [PATCH] scsi: Fix failed request error code Damien Le Moal
2018-04-04  6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2018-04-04  7:06   ` Damien Le Moal
2018-04-04  7:35     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-04-04  7:39       ` Damien Le Moal
2018-04-04  7:51         ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180404085730.2df015c3@pentland.suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox