From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:49:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409164912.GF3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f0d4950-4ef1-a24f-0ad1-b274aa885f73@grimberg.me>
Hello, Sagi.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:37:15AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >If a completion occurs after blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset
> >rq->aborted_gstate and the request is again in flight when the timeout
> >expires then a request will be completed twice: a first time by the
> >timeout handler and a second time when the regular completion occurs.
> >
> >Additionally, the blk-mq timeout handling code ignores completions that
> >occur after blk_mq_check_expired() has been called and before
> >blk_mq_rq_timed_out() has reset rq->aborted_gstate. If a block driver
> >timeout handler always returns BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER then the result will
> >be that the request never terminates.
>
> OK, now I understand how we can complete twice. Israel, can you verify
> this patch solves your double completion problem?
>
> Given that it is, the change log of your patches should be modified to
> the original bug report it solves.
>
> Thread starts here:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-February/015848.html
Can you please see whether the following two patches fix the problem
you've been seeing?
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180402190053.GC388343@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180402190120.GD388343@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 5:20 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix recently introduced races in the timeout handling code Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 8:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 14:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:42 ` Israel Rukshin
2018-04-09 16:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-04-09 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-09 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 18:56 ` tj
2018-04-09 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-09 21:40 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180409164912.GF3126663@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).