From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.113]:62368 "EHLO NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753099AbeDIRHS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:07:18 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Hans de Goede CC: Jiri Kosina , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:07:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20180409170713.GE2341@sasha-vm> References: <20180403131634.13187-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> <585b5f34-8b00-bf84-5b99-fa204a3e3e75@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <585b5f34-8b00-bf84-5b99-fa204a3e3e75@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >Hi, > >On 06-04-18 22:05, Sasha Levin wrote: >>Hi, >> >>[This is an automated email] >> >>This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined >>to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 20.8863) >> >>The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.9= 2, v4.4.126. >> >>v4.16: Build OK! >>v4.15.15: Build OK! >>v4.14.32: Build OK! >>v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_d= sm()") >> >>v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_d= sm()") > >Cool, first time I see this bot in action, nice work. I'll leave it out, thanks! >>Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable = tree. > >So FWIW this commit is NOT stable material (it cannot hurt, but it is not >necessary). This commit really only makes sense together with a new touchs= creen >driver which does actually know how to handle the CHPN0001 touchscreen. > >For future mails like this, do I understand the mail correctly that if I >do NOT want a patch picked up by the -stable helper bot to go to stable >I do not have to do anything? I would probably try and pick it up without an ack. If possible, even a brief "no" reply if you don't want it in stable would be great. Thanks!=