From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Reported-by: Jason Kridner" , Linus Walleij , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 092/190] gpio: label descriptors using the device name Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:35:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20180411183555.983850013@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180411183550.114495991@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180411183550.114495991@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Linus Walleij [ Upstream commit 24e78079bf2250874e33da2e7cfbb6db72d3caf4 ] Some GPIO lines appear named "?" in the lsgpio dump due to their requesting drivers not passing a reasonable label. Most typically this happens if a device tree node just defines gpios = <...> and not foo-gpios = <...>, the former gets named "foo" and the latter gets named "?". However the struct device passed in is always valid so let's just label the GPIO with dev_name() on the device if no proper label was passed. Cc: Reported-by: Jason Kridner Reported-by: Jason Kridner Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2145,7 +2145,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get return desc; } - status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id); + /* If a connection label was passed use that, else use the device name as label */ + status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id ? con_id : dev_name(dev)); if (status < 0) return ERR_PTR(status);