From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-co1nam03on0123.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.40.123]:52096 "EHLO NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751622AbeDOOhk (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:37:40 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 168/189] nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 14:37:39 +0000 Message-ID: <20180415143737.GN2341@sasha-vm> References: <20180409001637.162453-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409001637.162453-168-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409152746.GA25317@parsley.fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20180409152746.GA25317@parsley.fieldses.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:27:47AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >What's your default on these patches on these AUTOSEL patches if you >don't get an ACK or NACK? Do you apply them anyway? Right now it's opt-out, so it'll get merged unless you NACK it. In general, these patches get higher visibility as a notice will be sent a few times for each of these, when: 1. I added it to my queue 2. When Greg sends his review cycle 3. Once a stable kernel is released >(I'd skip this one as it doesn't meet the "It must fix a real bug that >bothers people" criterion. But I don't recall it *causing* any bugs >either, so the stakes are low, I'm mainly just curious.) I'll drop it, thanks!