From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52828 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754159AbeDYKm6 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:42:58 -0400
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 138/183] perf evsel: Fix period/freq terms setup
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:35:58 +0200
Message-Id: <20180425103248.083184263@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180425103242.532713678@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180425103242.532713678@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>


[ Upstream commit 49c0ae80eb32426fa133246200628e529067c595 ]

Stephane reported that we don't set properly PERIOD sample type for
events with period term defined.

Before:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|PERIOD, ...

After:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME, ...

Setting PERIOD sample type based on period term setup.

Committer note:

When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
need to ask the kernel, for this event, via perf_event_attr.sample_type
|= PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample for this
event, as we know it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.

Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201083812.11359-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -736,12 +736,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct pe
 			if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) {
 				attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
 				attr->freq = 0;
+				perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
 			}
 			break;
 		case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ:
 			if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) {
 				attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq;
 				attr->freq = 1;
+				perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
 			}
 			break;
 		case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_TIME: