From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serdev: fix missing static modifier on DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:07:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427070753.GB4931@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180427033358.13167-1-david@lechnology.com>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:33:58PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> This fixes the compile error "multiple definition of `dev_attr_modalias'"
> by adding the static modifier to DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias).
>
> This change was made in the mainline kernel in 2460942f51f1 ("serdev: do
> not generate modaliases for controllers") along with some other changes.
>
> Fixes: 4fe99816a1ab ("tty: serdev: use dev_groups and not dev_attrs for bus_type")
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
>
> Should we pick up the patch 2460942f51f1 ("serdev: do not generate modaliases
> for controllers") for stable or is this patch good enough?
>
> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> index 97db76afced2..25298b7b2419 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> return of_device_modalias(dev, buf, PAGE_SIZE);
> }
> -DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias);
>
> static struct attribute *serdev_device_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_modalias.attr,
This patch implies that there is also another "global" modalias variable
somewhere in the system, right? Where is that one being defined?
And I do like to keep original commits for stable trees, but this one
might be ok here, if we figure out what this is conflicting with.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-27 3:33 [PATCH] tty: serdev: fix missing static modifier on DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias) David Lechner
2018-04-27 7:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-04-27 19:46 ` David Lechner
2018-04-28 4:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180427070753.GB4931@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).