Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: Do not check FAIL bit when executing a SET_FEATURES op
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 11:42:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180511094215.3432-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> (raw)

The ONFI spec clearly says that FAIL bit is only valid for PROGRAM,
ERASE and READ-with-on-die-ECC operations, and should be ignored
otherwise.

It seems that checking it after sending a SET_FEATURES is a bad idea
because a previous READ, PROGRAM or ERASE op may have failed, and
depending on the implementation, the FAIL bit is not cleared until a
new READ, PROGRAM or ERASE is started.

This leads to ->set_features() returning -EIO while it actually worked,
which can sometimes stop a batch of READ/PROGRAM ops.

Note that we only fix the ->exec_op() path here, because some drivers
are abusing the NAND_STATUS_FAIL flag in their ->waitfunc()
implementation to propagate other kind of errors, like
wait-ready-timeout or controller-related errors. Let's not try to fix
those drivers since they worked fine so far.

Fixes: 8878b126df76 ("mtd: nand: add ->exec_op() implementation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
This patch is fixing a problem we had with on-die ECC on Micron
NANDs [1].
On these chips, when you have an ECC failure, the FAIL bit is set and
it's not cleared until the next READ operation, which led the following
SET_FEATURES (used to re-enable on-die ECC) to fail with -EIO and
stopped the batch of page reads started by UBIFS, which in turn led to
unmountable FS.

[1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/907874/
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index f28c3a555861..ee29f34562ab 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -2174,7 +2174,6 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 feature,
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
 	const u8 *params = data;
 	int i, ret;
-	u8 status;
 
 	if (chip->exec_op) {
 		const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
@@ -2188,26 +2187,18 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 feature,
 		};
 		struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
 
-		ret = nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-
-		ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	} else {
-		chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1);
-		for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
-			chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]);
+		return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
+	}
 
-		ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
+	chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1);
+	for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
+		chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]);
 
-		status = ret;
-	}
+	ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
-	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
+	if (ret & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
 		return -EIO;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.14.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-11  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-11  9:42 Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-05-11 11:26 ` [PATCH] mtd: nand: Do not check FAIL bit when executing a SET_FEATURES op Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180511094215.3432-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox