From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57908 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022AbeENGvO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 02:51:14 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, DaeRyong Jeong , Takashi Iwai Subject: [PATCH 4.4 15/56] ALSA: aloop: Add missing cable lock to ctl API callbacks Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:48:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20180514064756.523645687@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180514064754.853201981@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180514064754.853201981@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Takashi Iwai commit 76b3421b39bd610546931fc923edcf90c18fa395 upstream. Some control API callbacks in aloop driver are too lazy to take the loopback->cable_lock and it results in possible races of cable access while it's being freed. It eventually lead to a UAF, as reported by fuzzer recently. This patch covers such control API callbacks and add the proper mutex locks. Reported-by: DaeRyong Jeong Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- sound/drivers/aloop.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c +++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c @@ -832,9 +832,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_shift_get(struc { struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].rate_shift; + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); return 0; } @@ -866,9 +868,11 @@ static int loopback_notify_get(struct sn { struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].notify; + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); return 0; } @@ -880,12 +884,14 @@ static int loopback_notify_put(struct sn int change = 0; val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] ? 1 : 0; + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); if (val != loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].notify) { loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].notify = val; change = 1; } + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); return change; } @@ -893,15 +899,18 @@ static int loopback_active_get(struct sn struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) { struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); - struct loopback_cable *cable = loopback->cables - [kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1]; + struct loopback_cable *cable; + unsigned int val = 0; + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); + cable = loopback->cables[kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1]; if (cable != NULL) { unsigned int running = cable->running ^ cable->pause; val = (running & (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) ? 1 : 0; } + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = val; return 0; } @@ -944,9 +953,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_get(struct snd_ { struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].rate; + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); return 0; } @@ -966,9 +977,11 @@ static int loopback_channels_get(struct { struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); + mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock); ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice] [kcontrol->id.device].channels; + mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock); return 0; }