From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:56312 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752011AbeENMDb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 May 2018 08:03:31 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 05:03:28 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/srpt: Increase port count
Message-ID: <20180514120328.GA5081@infradead.org>
References: <20180510223209.10277-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180510223209.10277-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:32:09PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Since there are adapters that have four ports, increase the size of
> the srpt_device.port[] array. This patch avoids that the following
> warning is hit with quad port Chelsio adapters:
> 
>     WARN_ON(sdev->device->phys_port_cnt > ARRAY_SIZE(sdev->port));

Should we add a IB_MAX_PORTS define that ULPs can rely on in the core?