From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH ghak82] audit: Fix extended comparison of GID/EGID
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:31:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517153114.27317-1-omosnace@redhat.com> (raw)
The audit_filter_rules() function in auditsc.c used the in_[e]group_p()
functions to check GID/EGID match, but these functions use the current
task's credentials, while the comparison should use the credentials of
the task given to audit_filter_rules() as a parameter (tsk).
Note that we can use group_search(cred->group_info, ...) as a
replacement for both in_group_p and in_egroup_p as these functions only
compare the parameter to cred->fsgid/egid and then call group_search.
In fact, the usage of in_group_p was incorrect also because it compared
to cred->fsgid and not cred->gid.
GitHub issue:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/82
Fixes: 37eebe39c973 ("audit: improve GID/EGID comparation logic")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
---
kernel/auditsc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index cbab0da86d15..ec38e4d97c23 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -490,20 +490,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
result = audit_gid_comparator(cred->gid, f->op, f->gid);
if (f->op == Audit_equal) {
if (!result)
- result = in_group_p(f->gid);
+ result = groups_search(cred->group_info, f->gid);
} else if (f->op == Audit_not_equal) {
if (result)
- result = !in_group_p(f->gid);
+ result = !groups_search(cred->group_info, f->gid);
}
break;
case AUDIT_EGID:
result = audit_gid_comparator(cred->egid, f->op, f->gid);
if (f->op == Audit_equal) {
if (!result)
- result = in_egroup_p(f->gid);
+ result = groups_search(cred->group_info, f->gid);
} else if (f->op == Audit_not_equal) {
if (result)
- result = !in_egroup_p(f->gid);
+ result = !groups_search(cred->group_info, f->gid);
}
break;
case AUDIT_SGID:
--
2.17.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 15:31 Ondrej Mosnacek [this message]
2018-05-17 17:07 ` [PATCH ghak82] audit: Fix extended comparison of GID/EGID Richard Guy Briggs
2018-05-18 7:44 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517153114.27317-1-omosnace@redhat.com \
--to=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox