From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35514 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S968351AbeEXJzY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 05:55:24 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Antoine Tenart , Herbert Xu , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 094/165] crypto: inside-secure - do not process request if no command was issued Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:38:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20180524093625.824194216@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180524093621.979359379@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180524093621.979359379@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Antoine Tenart [ Upstream commit 95831ceafc0de7d94a5fe86ebb1c2042317cc2cd ] This patch adds a check in the SafeXcel dequeue function, to avoid processing request further if no hardware command was issued. This can happen in certain cases where the ->send() function caches all the data that would have been send. Fixes: 809778e02cd4 ("crypto: inside-secure - fix hash when length is a multiple of a block") Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c @@ -462,6 +462,15 @@ void safexcel_dequeue(struct safexcel_cr if (backlog) backlog->complete(backlog, -EINPROGRESS); + /* In case the send() helper did not issue any command to push + * to the engine because the input data was cached, continue to + * dequeue other requests as this is valid and not an error. + */ + if (!commands && !results) { + kfree(request); + continue; + } + spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock); list_add_tail(&request->list, &priv->ring[ring].list); spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock);