From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57696 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbeFEKUQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 06:20:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:19:53 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, jslaby@suse.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.9-stable] serial: pl011: add console matching function Message-ID: <20180605101953.GC26129@kroah.com> References: <20180604131612.14407-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180604131612.14407-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:16:12PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > From: Aleksey Makarov > > Commit 10879ae5f12e9cab3c4e8e9504c1aaa8a033bde7 upstream. > > This patch adds function pl011_console_match() that implements > method match of struct console. It allows to match consoles against > data specified in a string, for example taken from command line or > compiled by ACPI SPCR table handler. > > This patch was merged to tty-next but then reverted because of > conflict with > > commit 46e36683f433 ("serial: earlycon: Extend earlycon command line option to support 64-bit addresses") > > Now it is fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov > Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley > Acked-by: Russell King > Tested-by: Christopher Covington > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel > --- > > Please consider for v4.9-stable. It is the missing puzzle piece for SPCR > support on arm64 ACPI systems, which got merged for v4.9 [0]. Now that more > systems are becoming available to people working in the kernel community, it > turns out that v4.9 distro installers (e.g., Debian Stretch) won't work > unless you pass a 'console=' parameter explicitly, which is annoying. > Given that it was clearly the intent to include this code at the time, > I hope it will be considered for backporting. > > [0] To quote the tty maintainer: > > Also in here is the long-suffering ACPI SPCR patchset, which was > passed around from maintainer to maintainer like a hot-potato. Seems I > was the sucker^Wlucky one. All of those patches have been acked by the > various subsystem maintainers as well. Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h