stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk" <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 2/2] Btrfs: make raid6 rebuild retry more
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:39:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180615023918.99280-2-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180615023918.99280-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>

From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

[ Upstream commit 8810f7517a3bc4ca2d41d022446d3f5fd6b77c09 ]

There is a scenario that can end up with rebuild process failing to
return good content, i.e.
suppose that all disks can be read without problems and if the content
that was read out doesn't match its checksum, currently for raid6
btrfs at most retries twice,

- the 1st retry is to rebuild with all other stripes, it'll eventually
  be a raid5 xor rebuild,
- if the 1st fails, the 2nd retry will deliberately fail parity p so
  that it will do raid6 style rebuild,

however, the chances are that another non-parity stripe content also
has something corrupted, so that the above retries are not able to
return correct content, and users will think of this as data loss.
More seriouly, if the loss happens on some important internal btree
roots, it could refuse to mount.

This extends btrfs to do more retries and each retry fails only one
stripe.  Since raid6 can tolerate 2 disk failures, if there is one
more failure besides the failure on which we're recovering, this can
always work.

The worst case is to retry as many times as the number of raid6 disks,
but given the fact that such a scenario is really rare in practice,
it's still acceptable.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/raid56.c  | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  9 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index 1a33d3eb36de..b9fa99577bf7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -2160,11 +2160,21 @@ int raid56_parity_recover(struct btrfs_root *root, struct bio *bio,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * reconstruct from the q stripe if they are
-	 * asking for mirror 3
+	 * Loop retry:
+	 * for 'mirror == 2', reconstruct from all other stripes.
+	 * for 'mirror_num > 2', select a stripe to fail on every retry.
 	 */
-	if (mirror_num == 3)
-		rbio->failb = rbio->real_stripes - 2;
+	if (mirror_num > 2) {
+		/*
+		 * 'mirror == 3' is to fail the p stripe and
+		 * reconstruct from the q stripe.  'mirror > 3' is to
+		 * fail a data stripe and reconstruct from p+q stripe.
+		 */
+		rbio->failb = rbio->real_stripes - (mirror_num - 1);
+		ASSERT(rbio->failb > 0);
+		if (rbio->failb <= rbio->faila)
+			rbio->failb--;
+	}
 
 	ret = lock_stripe_add(rbio);
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index ed75d70b4bc2..ef19567453bb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -5056,7 +5056,14 @@ int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical, u64 len)
 	else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
 		ret = 2;
 	else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
-		ret = 3;
+		/*
+		 * There could be two corrupted data stripes, we need
+		 * to loop retry in order to rebuild the correct data.
+		 * 
+		 * Fail a stripe at a time on every retry except the
+		 * stripe under reconstruction.
+		 */
+		ret = map->num_stripes;
 	else
 		ret = 1;
 	free_extent_map(em);
-- 
2.17.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-15  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-15  2:39 [PATCH 4.4 1/2] Revert "Btrfs: fix scrub to repair raid6 corruption" Sasha Levin
2018-06-15  2:39 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2018-06-18  4:20 ` gregkh
2018-06-19  4:33   ` Sasha Levin
2018-06-19 20:10     ` gregkh
2018-06-19 20:15       ` Sasha Levin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-19 20:09 Sasha Levin
2018-06-19 20:09 ` [PATCH 4.4 2/2] Btrfs: make raid6 rebuild retry more Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180615023918.99280-2-alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --to=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).