From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:51:38 +0900 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Kohli, Gaurav" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 161/279] kthread, sched/wait: Fix kthread_parkme() completion issue Message-ID: <20180620185138.GD32326@kroah.com> References: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org> <20180618080615.492002239@linuxfoundation.org> <7ef9ee41-877b-0cc3-bd2d-f495b1d354bb@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ef9ee41-877b-0cc3-bd2d-f495b1d354bb@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10:31PM +0530, Kohli, Gaurav wrote: > Hi Greg, > > As more patches related to this are coming in 4.17, so it is better if all > go together on different branches, plz suggest. I do not understand, sorry. What is wrong with this as-is? If I need to take other patches as well, please let me know what commits and what stable tree(s) they belong on. thanks, greg k-h