From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34678 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752886AbeF1PmF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:42:05 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:52:33 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Cc: 20180524201711.732785782@stormcage.americas.sgi.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrew.banman@hpe.com,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com,
        jgross@suse.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, russ.anderson@hpe.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "x86/platform/UV: Use new set memory block size function"
 has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Message-ID: <20180628145233.GA30738@kroah.com>
References: <153015170913288@kroah.com>
 <8bbcb31a-ab7e-fdaa-3a3f-19e8def71922@hpe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8bbcb31a-ab7e-fdaa-3a3f-19e8def71922@hpe.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:31:57AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> Until the original patch that adds the set_memory_block_size_order()
> function is added, then the following two patches should also not be
> applied.  In fact I'm surprised it built with that function undefined.

It didn't, I dropped them and you saw the emails about that.

thanks,

greg k-h