From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:37239 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752491AbeF2KBf (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 06:01:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:01:29 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Peter Zijlstra , Tetsuo Handa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] printk/nmi: Prevent deadlock when accessing the main log buffer in NMI Message-ID: <20180629100129.GA10345@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20180627140817.27764-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20180627142028.11259-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20180628022507.GD481@jagdpanzerIV> <20180628094125.cq5qunckjyxhbovb@pathway.suse.cz> <20180629014703.GA614@jagdpanzerIV> <20180629072507.lroaj34gxl2d5bze@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180629072507.lroaj34gxl2d5bze@pathway.suse.cz> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (06/29/18 09:25), Petr Mladek wrote: > > So I summon Mr. Rostedt! > > > > Does schedule_console_output() look bad? > > What about defer_console_output()? > > I am fine with both. I slightly prefer defer_console_output() I am fine with defer_console_output(). -ss