stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	snitzer@redhat.com, toshi.kani@hpe.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:57:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705215733.GA16352@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530455145138164@kroah.com>

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 04:25:45PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From dbc626597c39b24cefce09fbd8e9dea85869a801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:30:41 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported
> 
> Currently device_supports_dax() just checks to see if the QUEUE_FLAG_DAX
> flag is set on the device's request queue to decide whether or not the
> device supports filesystem DAX.  Really we should be using
> bdev_dax_supported() like filesystems do at mount time.  This performs
> other tests like checking to make sure the dax_direct_access() path works.
> 
> We also explicitly clear QUEUE_FLAG_DAX on the DM device's request queue if
> any of the underlying devices do not support DAX.  This makes the handling
> of QUEUE_FLAG_DAX consistent with the setting/clearing of most other flags
> in dm_table_set_restrictions().
> 
> Now that bdev_dax_supported() explicitly checks for QUEUE_FLAG_DAX, this
> will ensure that filesystems built upon DM devices will only be able to
> mount with DAX if all underlying devices also support DAX.

Hey Greg,

It turns out that this series isn't needed for the v4.9-stable tree.  The
outcome we want with this series is to prevent DM devices made of one
DAX-capable namespace and one DAX-incapable block device from using DAX.

We needed patches to prevent this from happening in v4.14-stable and
v4.17-stable, but v4.9-stable already does the correct thing.

For those interested in the details, the DM device doesn't have QUEUE_FLAG_DAX
set per the check in dm_setup_md_queue(), and we notice that in
bdev_direct_access() via the blk_queue_dax() check.  This causes the
filesystem to see that DAX isn't supported.

So, it looks like the bug was introduced when that check was removed from
bdev_direct_access(), not back when DAX support was initially introduced in DM
like I thought previously.

Thanks,
- Ross

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-01 14:25 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-07-05 21:57 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180705215733.GA16352@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).