public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 06:35:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726133527.GU1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180725173828.2227-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>

Hello,

ISTR giving the same feedback before.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:38:28AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> +struct remove_dev_work {
> +	struct callback_head	head;
> +	struct scsi_device	*sdev;
> +};
> +
> +static void delete_sdev(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct remove_dev_work *work = container_of(head, typeof(*work), head);
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = work->sdev;
> +
> +	scsi_remove_device(sdev);
> +	kfree(work);
> +	scsi_device_put(sdev);
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t
>  sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  		  const char *buf, size_t count)
>  {
> -	if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
> -		scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
> -	return count;
> -};
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> +	struct remove_dev_work *work;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = scsi_device_get(sdev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +	ret = -ENOMEM;
> +	work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!work)
> +		goto put;
> +	work->head.func = delete_sdev;
> +	work->sdev = sdev;
> +	ret = task_work_add(current, &work->head, false);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto free;
> +	ret = count;
> +
> +out:
> +	return ret;
> +
> +free:
> +	kfree(work);
> +
> +put:
> +	scsi_device_put(sdev);
> +	goto out;
> +}

Making removal asynchronous this way sometimes causes issues because
whether the user sees the device released or not is racy.
kernfs/sysfs have mechanisms to deal with these cases - remove_self
and kernfs_break_active_protection().  Have you looked at those?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-25 17:38 [PATCH, RESEND] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2018-07-26  1:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-07-26 11:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-26 12:50 ` Jack Wang
2018-07-26 13:35 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-07-26 14:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-26 14:14     ` tj
2018-07-26 21:57       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 14:13         ` tj
2018-07-30 17:28           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 17:31             ` tj
2018-07-30 17:50               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 17:57                 ` tj
2018-07-29  4:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 14:17     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180726133527.GU1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox