From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:50418 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727209AbeHJQgj (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:36:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:06:34 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Masami Hiramatsu , Namhyung Kim , Andrew Morton , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Use synchronize_rcu() not synchronize_sched() Message-ID: <20180810140633.GD3677@redhat.com> References: <20180809160553.469e1e32@gandalf.local.home> <20180810113548.GA3677@redhat.com> <20180810084832.70b9a62a@gandalf.local.home> <20180810133608.GC3677@redhat.com> <20180810094412.79d7b181@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180810094412.79d7b181@gandalf.local.home> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Are you OK with this patch? I set it for stable and plan on pushing it > with the patches for the upcoming merge window. If you are OK, mind > giving me an Acked or Reviewed-by? Yes, thanks, feel free to add Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov > Even if it is theoretical, we should make sure it can't happen. But > this is unrelated to the current patch, agreed. > and if we should fix this, then > it can be a separate patch. I don't think your change hurts, and even > if it can't technically happen, it may let us sleep better at night. > Want to send a formal patch to make this change? OK, will do. Oleg.