From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com>,
George Anchev <studio@anchev.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has too much RAM
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:44:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823154437.GC12066@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823134418.17008-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 03:44:18PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system
> with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. In fact
> it's a CPU with 36bits phys limit (64GB) and 32GB memory, but due to holes
> in the e820 map, the main region is almost 500MB over the 32GB limit:
Ah I see it's a client part with very large DIMMs and someone being
very brave and using that much memory without ECC.
>
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000081effffff] usable
>
> Suggestions to use 'mem=32G' to prefer L1TF mitigation while losing the 500MB
> revealed, that there's an off-by-one error in the check in
> l1tf_select_mitigation(). l1tf_pfn_limit() returns the last usable pfn
> (inclusive), but it's more common and hopefully less error-prone to return the
> first pfn that's over limit, so this patch changes that and updates the other
> callers.
I can see the off by one, but does it really cause the user's problem?
They will be still over the limit in any case, with or without off-by-one.
So the description has nothing to do with the fix. Or do I miss something?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 13:44 [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has too much RAM Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:28 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 20:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 22:07 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:23 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 7:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 10:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 15:44 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2018-08-23 20:20 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 2:22 ` Andre Tomt
2018-08-24 3:35 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-29 2:04 ` Christopher Snowhill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823154437.GC12066@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kode54@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=studio@anchev.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox