From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59234 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727284AbeICUjn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:39:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:18:52 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zubin Mithra <zsm@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, raven@themaw.net, groeck@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.14.y] autofs: fix autofs_sbi() does not check super
 block type
Message-ID: <20180903161852.GB6712@kroah.com>
References: <20180830171025.118278-1-zsm@chromium.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180830171025.118278-1-zsm@chromium.org>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:10:25AM -0700, Zubin Mithra wrote:
> From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
> 
> commit 0633da48f0793aeba27f82d30605624416723a91 upstream.
> 
> autofs_sbi() does not check the superblock magic number to verify it has
> been given an autofs super block.
> 
> Backport Note: autofs4 has been renamed to autofs upstream. As a result
> the upstream patch does not apply cleanly onto 4.14.y.

What about other kernel trees, this should also go into 4.18.y, right?
Anything older than 4.14.y?

thanks,

greg k-h