From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42456 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728222AbeICVg4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 17:36:56 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai , Felipe Balbi , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 017/165] usb: gadget: r8a66597: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in r8a66597_queue() Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:55:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20180903165655.891250346@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180903165655.003605184@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180903165655.003605184@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jia-Ju Bai [ Upstream commit f36b507c14c4b6e634463a610294e9cb0065c8ea ] The driver may sleep in an interrupt handler. The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16.7 is: [FUNC] r8a66597_queue(GFP_KERNEL) drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 1193: r8a66597_queue in get_status drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 1301: get_status in setup_packet drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 1381: setup_packet in irq_control_stage drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 1508: irq_control_stage in r8a66597_irq (interrupt handler) To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC. This bug is found by my static analysis tool (DSAC-2) and checked by my code review. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ __acquires(r8a66597->lock) r8a66597->ep0_req->length = 2; /* AV: what happens if we get called again before that gets through? */ spin_unlock(&r8a66597->lock); - r8a66597_queue(r8a66597->gadget.ep0, r8a66597->ep0_req, GFP_KERNEL); + r8a66597_queue(r8a66597->gadget.ep0, r8a66597->ep0_req, GFP_ATOMIC); spin_lock(&r8a66597->lock); }