From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45764 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728380AbeICVql (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 17:46:41 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi Subject: [PATCH 4.14 121/165] fuse: fix unlocked access to processing queue Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:56:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20180903165701.614959153@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180903165655.003605184@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180903165655.003605184@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Miklos Szeredi commit 45ff350bbd9d0f0977ff270a0d427c71520c0c37 upstream. fuse_dev_release() assumes that it's the only one referencing the fpq->processing list, but that's not true, since fuse_abort_conn() can be doing the same without any serialization between the two. Fixes: c3696046beb3 ("fuse: separate pqueue for clones") Cc: # v4.2 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/fuse/dev.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c @@ -2148,9 +2148,15 @@ int fuse_dev_release(struct inode *inode if (fud) { struct fuse_conn *fc = fud->fc; struct fuse_pqueue *fpq = &fud->pq; + LIST_HEAD(to_end); + spin_lock(&fpq->lock); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&fpq->io)); - end_requests(fc, &fpq->processing); + list_splice_init(&fpq->processing, &to_end); + spin_unlock(&fpq->lock); + + end_requests(fc, &to_end); + /* Are we the last open device? */ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fc->dev_count)) { WARN_ON(fc->iq.fasync != NULL);