From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47996 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1725942AbeIGMWe (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:22:34 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:42:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on
 MTK platforms
Message-ID: <20180907074251.GA2079@kroah.com>
References: <e8698cc5710a9d1f25e33e2201e2177bfbfec75c.1536305256.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e8698cc5710a9d1f25e33e2201e2177bfbfec75c.1536305256.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:29:12PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> The MTK xHCI controller use some reserved bytes in endpoint context for
> bandwidth scheduling, so need keep them in xhci_endpoint_copy();

If they are "reserved" shouldn't they be properly named?  And by using
reserved bytes, isn't that a spec violation?

thanks,

greg k-h