stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: partitions: fix of_node_get/put balance in parser
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:53:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910145312.3b9ae4ad@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907163824.6cec1a43@xps13>

Hi Miquel,

On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:38:24 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I forgot to add Rafal which I know worked a lot on the parsers.
> 
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Fri,  7 Sep 2018
> 16:35:54 +0200:
> 
> > While at first mtd_part_of_parse() would just call
> > of_get_chil_by_name(), it has been edited to first try to get the OF
> > node thanks to mtd_get_of_node() and fallback on
> > of_get_child_by_name().
> > 
> > A of_node_put() was a bit below in the code, to balance the
> > of_get_child_by_name(). However, despite its name, mtd_get_of_node()
> > does not take a reference on the OF node.

That's probably something we should patch at some point, but that
implies patching all mtd_get_of_node() users at the same time, so let's
keep that for later.

BTW, if mtd_get_of_node() was actually retaining a reference, you
would miss an of_node_put() in the !mtd_is_partition(master) case.

> > It is a simple helper hiding
> > some pointer logic to retrieve the OF node related to an MTD
> > device. People often used it this way:
> > 
> >     of_node_put(mtd_get_of_node(<mtd>)).

I don't get your point. Are you saying other places in the code are
doing the wrong thing? Should we fix them too?

> > 
> > The direct effect of such unbalanced reference counting is visible by
> > rmmod'ing any module that would have added MTD partitions:
> > 
> >     OF: ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on <of_path_to_partition>
> > 
> > As it seems normal to get a reference on the OF node during the
> > of_property_for_each_string() that follows, add a call to
> > of_node_get() when relevant.
> > 
> > Fixes: 76a832254ab0 ("mtd: partitions: use DT info for parsing partitions with "compatible" prop")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

You can drop the above line since this patch is fixing a bug introduced
in 4.19-rc1.

> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> > index 52e2cb35fc79..99c460facd5e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> > @@ -873,8 +873,11 @@ static int mtd_part_of_parse(struct mtd_info *master,
> >  	int ret, err = 0;
> >  
> >  	np = mtd_get_of_node(master);
> > -	if (!mtd_is_partition(master))
> > +	if (mtd_is_partition(master))
> > +		of_node_get(np);
> > +	else
> >  		np = of_get_child_by_name(np, "partitions");
> > +
> >  	of_property_for_each_string(np, "compatible", prop, compat) {
> >  		parser = mtd_part_get_compatible_parser(compat);
> >  		if (!parser)  

The patch itself looks correct, but I'd like some clarification about
the commit message before applying it.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 14:35 [PATCH] mtd: partitions: fix of_node_get/put balance in parser Miquel Raynal
2018-09-07 14:38 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-09-10 12:53   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-09-10 13:14     ` Miquel Raynal
2018-09-10 13:25       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10 13:32         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10 13:38         ` Miquel Raynal
2018-09-10 13:42           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-17  9:55             ` Miquel Raynal
2018-09-17 13:51               ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-17 14:03                 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-09-17 14:24                   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180910145312.3b9ae4ad@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).