From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:19:27 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross , Jan Beulich , Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 103/115] x86/xen: dont write ptes directly in 32-bit PV guests Message-ID: <20180914181927.GA20957@kroah.com> References: <20180913131823.327472833@linuxfoundation.org> <20180913131829.701763608@linuxfoundation.org> <20180914171222.GA30580@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180914171222.GA30580@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:12:22AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:32:03PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Juergen Gross > > > > commit f7c90c2aa4004808dff777ba6ae2c7294dd06851 upstream. > > > > In some cases 32-bit PAE PV guests still write PTEs directly instead of > > using hypercalls. This is especially bad when clearing a PTE as this is > > done via 32-bit writes which will produce intermediate L1TF attackable > > PTEs. > > > > Change the code to use hypercalls instead. > > > > Good that we got this in. Should we also take this one: > b2d7a075a1cc ("x86/pae: use 64 bit atomic xchg function in native_ptep_get_and_clear") > > Which is under the line of the same issue? It's also in this patch series, the very next one in fact :) thanks, greg k-h