From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50120 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729124AbeIREi6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:38:58 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Martin KaFai Lau , Arthur Fabre , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.18 054/158] selftests/bpf: fix a typo in map in map test Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:41:24 +0200 Message-Id: <20180917211713.749852618@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180917211710.383360696@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180917211710.383360696@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Roman Gushchin [ Upstream commit 0069fb854364da79fd99236ea620affc8e1152d5 ] Commit fbeb1603bf4e ("bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded") revealed a typo in commit fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map"): BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0) was used instead of BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0). I've noticed the problem by running bpf kselftests. Fixes: fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Arthur Fabre Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 }, @@ -7020,7 +7020,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 }, @@ -7042,7 +7042,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },