From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
Stefan Chulski <stefanc@marvell.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free()
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:39:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86r2hovwrq.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote on Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:39:21
+0100:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:01:29 +0100,
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since the addition of platform MSI support, there were two helpers
> > supposed to allocate/free IRQs for a device:
> >
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
> > platform_msi_domain_free_irqs()
> >
> > In these helpers, IRQ descriptors are allocated in the "alloc" routine
> > while they are freed in the "free" one.
> >
> > Later, two other helpers have been added to handle IRQ domains on top
> > of MSI domains:
> >
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc()
> > platform_msi_domain_free()
> >
> > Seen from the outside, the logic is pretty close with the former
> > helpers and people used it with the same logic as before: a
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc() call should be balanced with a
> > platform_msi_domain_free() call. While this is probably what was
> > intended to do, the platform_msi_domain_free() does not remove/free
> > the IRQ descriptor(s) created/inserted in
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc().
> >
> > One effect of such situation is that removing a module that requested
> > an IRQ will let one orphaned IRQ descriptor (with an allocated MSI
> > entry) in the device descriptors list. Next time the module will be
> > inserted back, one will observe that the allocation will happen twice
> > in the MSI domain, one time for the remaining descriptor, one time for
> > the new one. It also has the side effect to quickly overshoot the
> > maximum number of allocated MSI and then prevent any module requesting
> > an interrupt in the same domain to be inserted anymore.
> >
> > This situation has been met with loops of insertion/removal of the
> > mvpp2.ko module (requesting 15 MSIs each time).
> >
> > Fixes: 552c494a7666 ("platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > index 60d6cc618f1c..b9d9d1729215 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > @@ -354,6 +354,20 @@ platform_msi_create_device_domain(struct device *dev,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static void platform_msi_domain_free_descs(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq,
> > + int nvec)
> > +{
> > + struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
> > + struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev_to_msi_list(data->dev), list) {
> > + if (desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)) {
> > + list_del(&desc->list);
> > + free_msi_entry(desc);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * platform_msi_domain_free - Free interrupts associated with a platform-msi
> > * domain
> > @@ -375,6 +389,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> >
> > irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
> > }
> > +
> > + platform_msi_domain_free_descs(domain, virq, nvec);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> Good catch, but I wonder why you don't use the existing
> helper instead. Something like this (untested):
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 60d6cc618f1c..87808ac08bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>
> irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
> }
> +
> + platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, virq, nvec);
First I tried exactly what you propose, however
platform_msi_free_descs() takes a "base" IRQ number which is not the
Linux global virq number but the local MSI domain index.
virq (in the above example) is checked against desc->platform.msi_index
(0, 1, 2, ... 29) while in the function I wrote, virq is checked
against desc->irq (12, 13, ..., 19, 26, 27, ..., 48).
If you prefer not to add a "platform_msi_domain_free_descs()" helper,
I see another solution which is to use desc->platform.msi_index instead
of virq, and put platform_msi_free_descs() inside the
for_each_msi_entry() loop (making it _safe otherwise it would crash
for each destroyed descriptor in the list).
See the below code.
I personally prefer the function in my first proposal which avoids
calling platform_msi_free_descs() once for each descriptor to free.
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
index b9d9d1729215..fb9aa6fcdad9 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
@@ -380,17 +380,16 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
unsigned int nvec)
{
struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
- struct msi_desc *desc;
- for_each_msi_entry(desc, data->dev) {
+ struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
+ for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, data->dev) {
if (WARN_ON(!desc->irq || desc->nvec_used != 1))
return;
if (!(desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)))
continue;
irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
+ platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, desc->platform.msi_index, 1);
}
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 5839d8062dfc..be8ec813dbfb 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ struct msi_desc {
list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list)
#define for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) \
list_for_each_entry((desc), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
+#define for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev) \
+ list_for_each_entry_safe((desc), (tmp), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
#define first_pci_msi_entry(pdev) first_msi_entry(&(pdev)->dev)
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 15:01 [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free() Miquel Raynal
2018-09-20 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-24 13:39 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2018-09-28 8:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-28 15:10 ` Miquel Raynal
[not found] ` <86k1moubgr.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2018-10-11 9:17 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox