public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	Stefan Chulski <stefanc@marvell.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free()
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:39:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86r2hovwrq.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote on Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:39:21
+0100:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:01:29 +0100,
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Since the addition of platform MSI support, there were two helpers
> > supposed to allocate/free IRQs for a device:
> > 
> >     platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
> >     platform_msi_domain_free_irqs()
> > 
> > In these helpers, IRQ descriptors are allocated in the "alloc" routine
> > while they are freed in the "free" one.
> > 
> > Later, two other helpers have been added to handle IRQ domains on top
> > of MSI domains:
> > 
> >     platform_msi_domain_alloc()
> >     platform_msi_domain_free()
> > 
> > Seen from the outside, the logic is pretty close with the former
> > helpers and people used it with the same logic as before: a
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc() call should be balanced with a
> > platform_msi_domain_free() call. While this is probably what was
> > intended to do, the platform_msi_domain_free() does not remove/free
> > the IRQ descriptor(s) created/inserted in
> > platform_msi_domain_alloc().
> > 
> > One effect of such situation is that removing a module that requested
> > an IRQ will let one orphaned IRQ descriptor (with an allocated MSI
> > entry) in the device descriptors list. Next time the module will be
> > inserted back, one will observe that the allocation will happen twice
> > in the MSI domain, one time for the remaining descriptor, one time for
> > the new one. It also has the side effect to quickly overshoot the
> > maximum number of allocated MSI and then prevent any module requesting
> > an interrupt in the same domain to be inserted anymore.
> > 
> > This situation has been met with loops of insertion/removal of the
> > mvpp2.ko module (requesting 15 MSIs each time).
> > 
> > Fixes: 552c494a7666 ("platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > index 60d6cc618f1c..b9d9d1729215 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> > @@ -354,6 +354,20 @@ platform_msi_create_device_domain(struct device *dev,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void platform_msi_domain_free_descs(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq,
> > +					   int nvec)
> > +{
> > +	struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
> > +	struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev_to_msi_list(data->dev), list) {
> > +		if (desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)) {
> > +			list_del(&desc->list);
> > +			free_msi_entry(desc);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * platform_msi_domain_free - Free interrupts associated with a platform-msi
> >   *                            domain
> > @@ -375,6 +389,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> >  
> >  		irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	platform_msi_domain_free_descs(domain, virq, nvec);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >   
> 
> Good catch, but I wonder why you don't use the existing
> helper instead. Something like this (untested):
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 60d6cc618f1c..87808ac08bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>  
>  		irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
>  	}
> +
> +	platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, virq, nvec);

First I tried exactly what you propose, however
platform_msi_free_descs() takes a "base" IRQ number which is not the
Linux global virq number but the local MSI domain index.

virq (in the above example) is checked against desc->platform.msi_index
(0, 1, 2, ... 29) while in the function I wrote, virq is checked
against desc->irq (12, 13, ..., 19, 26, 27, ..., 48).


If you prefer not to add a "platform_msi_domain_free_descs()" helper,
I see another solution which is to use desc->platform.msi_index instead
of virq, and put platform_msi_free_descs() inside the
for_each_msi_entry() loop (making it _safe otherwise it would crash
for each destroyed descriptor in the list).

See the below code.

I personally prefer the function in my first proposal which avoids
calling platform_msi_free_descs() once for each descriptor to free.



diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
index b9d9d1729215..fb9aa6fcdad9 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
@@ -380,17 +380,16 @@ void platform_msi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
                              unsigned int nvec)
 {
        struct platform_msi_priv_data *data = domain->host_data;
-       struct msi_desc *desc;
-       for_each_msi_entry(desc, data->dev) {
+       struct msi_desc *desc, *tmp;
+       for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, data->dev) {
                if (WARN_ON(!desc->irq || desc->nvec_used != 1))
                        return;
                if (!(desc->irq >= virq && desc->irq < (virq + nvec)))
                        continue;
 
                irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, desc->irq, 1);
+               platform_msi_free_descs(data->dev, desc->platform.msi_index, 1);
        }
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 5839d8062dfc..be8ec813dbfb 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ struct msi_desc {
        list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list)
 #define for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev)  \
        list_for_each_entry((desc), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
+#define for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev)        \
+       list_for_each_entry_safe((desc), (tmp), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
 #define first_pci_msi_entry(pdev)      first_msi_entry(&(pdev)->dev)



Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 15:01 [PATCH] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free() Miquel Raynal
2018-09-20 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-24 13:39   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2018-09-28  8:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-09-28 15:10       ` Miquel Raynal
     [not found]         ` <86k1moubgr.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2018-10-11  9:17           ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180924153938.4047e1b1@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox