From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com>,
Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue_discard()
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 08:12:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018001230.GA9379@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181012075310.4587-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:53:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> blk_queue_split() does respect this limit via bio splitting, so no
> need to do that in blkdev_issue_discard(), then we can align to
> normal bio submit(bio_add_page() & submit_bio()).
>
> More importantly, this patch fixes one issue introduced in a22c4d7e34402cc
> ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks"), in which
> zero discard bio may be generated in case of zero alignment.
>
> Fixes: a22c4d7e34402ccdf3 ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com>
> Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-lib.c | 28 ++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index d1b9dd03da25..bbd44666f2b5 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> {
> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> struct bio *bio = *biop;
> - unsigned int granularity;
> unsigned int op;
> - int alignment;
> sector_t bs_mask;
>
> if (!q)
> @@ -54,38 +52,16 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
> - granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
> - alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
> -
> while (nr_sects) {
> - unsigned int req_sects;
> - sector_t end_sect, tmp;
> + unsigned int req_sects = nr_sects;
> + sector_t end_sect;
>
> - /*
> - * Issue in chunks of the user defined max discard setting,
> - * ensuring that bi_size doesn't overflow
> - */
> - req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects,
> - q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
> if (!req_sects)
> goto fail;
> if (req_sects > UINT_MAX >> 9)
> req_sects = UINT_MAX >> 9;
>
> - /*
> - * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
> - * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
> - */
> end_sect = sector + req_sects;
> - tmp = end_sect;
> - if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
> - sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
> - end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
> - sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
> - end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
> - req_sects = end_sect - sector;
> - }
>
> bio = next_bio(bio, 0, gfp_mask);
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
> --
> 2.9.5
>
Ping...
This patch fixes BUG() in blk_mq_end_request() when zero-length discard
bio is generated from __blkdev_issue_discard().
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 7:53 [PATCH] block: don't deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue_discard() Ming Lei
2018-10-17 7:06 ` Dabrowski, Mariusz
2018-10-18 0:12 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-10-18 13:23 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018001230.GA9379@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox