* [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled
@ 2018-10-24 10:05 Boris Brezillon
2018-10-24 15:02 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2018-10-24 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt; +Cc: dri-devel, Boris Brezillon, stable
The source image might be only vertically scaled, and in this case
->is_unity will be false, but we'd still have to force ->x_scaling[0]
to VC4_SCALING_PPF for YUV conversion to work properly.
Let's replace the ->is_unity test by->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE
to cope with that.
Fixes: 658d8cbd07da ("drm/vc4: Fix the "no scaling" case on multi-planar YUV formats")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
index 60d5ad19cedd..32b7b9f47c5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vc4_plane_setup_clipping_and_scaling(struct drm_plane_state *state)
* even on a plane that's otherwise 1:1. Looks like only PPF
* works in that case, so let's pick that one.
*/
- if (vc4_state->is_unity)
+ if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
} else {
vc4_state->is_yuv = false;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled
2018-10-24 10:05 [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled Boris Brezillon
@ 2018-10-24 15:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-07 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2018-10-24 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt; +Cc: stable, dri-devel
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:05:03 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> The source image might be only vertically scaled, and in this case
> ->is_unity will be false, but we'd still have to force ->x_scaling[0]
> to VC4_SCALING_PPF for YUV conversion to work properly.
>
> Let's replace the ->is_unity test by->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE
> to cope with that.
>
> Fixes: 658d8cbd07da ("drm/vc4: Fix the "no scaling" case on multi-planar YUV formats")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> index 60d5ad19cedd..32b7b9f47c5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vc4_plane_setup_clipping_and_scaling(struct drm_plane_state *state)
> * even on a plane that's otherwise 1:1. Looks like only PPF
> * works in that case, so let's pick that one.
> */
> - if (vc4_state->is_unity)
> + if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
> vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
Actually, I'm not sure about this patch is needed. According to the
spec, we should not enable the scaler on the Y channel when ->is_unity
is true.
I tested it, and it seems to work if we just leave x_scaling[0] to
VC4_SCALING_NONE.
Eric, do you remember why you did that?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled
2018-10-24 15:02 ` Boris Brezillon
@ 2018-11-07 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
2018-11-08 9:41 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2018-11-07 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Brezillon; +Cc: stable, dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1829 bytes --]
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:05:03 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
>> The source image might be only vertically scaled, and in this case
>> ->is_unity will be false, but we'd still have to force ->x_scaling[0]
>> to VC4_SCALING_PPF for YUV conversion to work properly.
>>
>> Let's replace the ->is_unity test by->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE
>> to cope with that.
>>
>> Fixes: 658d8cbd07da ("drm/vc4: Fix the "no scaling" case on multi-planar YUV formats")
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> index 60d5ad19cedd..32b7b9f47c5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vc4_plane_setup_clipping_and_scaling(struct drm_plane_state *state)
>> * even on a plane that's otherwise 1:1. Looks like only PPF
>> * works in that case, so let's pick that one.
>> */
>> - if (vc4_state->is_unity)
>> + if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
>> vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
>
> Actually, I'm not sure about this patch is needed. According to the
> spec, we should not enable the scaler on the Y channel when ->is_unity
> is true.
> I tested it, and it seems to work if we just leave x_scaling[0] to
> VC4_SCALING_NONE.
Sorry, I've been delaying on this series until I could spend some time
looking at the spec.
I think you're right, I see no reason to kick us out of is_unity for
YUV -- you can have is_unity, Y unscaled, and UV scaled.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled
2018-11-07 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
@ 2018-11-08 9:41 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2018-11-08 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt; +Cc: stable, dri-devel
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 09:08:02 -0800
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:05:03 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The source image might be only vertically scaled, and in this case
> >> ->is_unity will be false, but we'd still have to force ->x_scaling[0]
> >> to VC4_SCALING_PPF for YUV conversion to work properly.
> >>
> >> Let's replace the ->is_unity test by->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE
> >> to cope with that.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 658d8cbd07da ("drm/vc4: Fix the "no scaling" case on multi-planar YUV formats")
> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> >> index 60d5ad19cedd..32b7b9f47c5d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
> >> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vc4_plane_setup_clipping_and_scaling(struct drm_plane_state *state)
> >> * even on a plane that's otherwise 1:1. Looks like only PPF
> >> * works in that case, so let's pick that one.
> >> */
> >> - if (vc4_state->is_unity)
> >> + if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
> >> vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
> >
> > Actually, I'm not sure about this patch is needed. According to the
> > spec, we should not enable the scaler on the Y channel when ->is_unity
> > is true.
> > I tested it, and it seems to work if we just leave x_scaling[0] to
> > VC4_SCALING_NONE.
>
> Sorry, I've been delaying on this series until I could spend some time
> looking at the spec.
>
> I think you're right, I see no reason to kick us out of is_unity for
> YUV -- you can have is_unity, Y unscaled, and UV scaled.
Okay, so I'll just remove
if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
What about the 2 other patches in this series? Patch 2 is fixing a real
bug, patch 3 is not fixing a bug, but according to the spec PPF is
better when the downscaling ratio is small.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-08 19:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-24 10:05 [PATCH 1/3] drm/vc4: Set PPF scaling when the source image is only vertically scaled Boris Brezillon
2018-10-24 15:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-07 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
2018-11-08 9:41 ` Boris Brezillon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox