From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dairinin@gmail.com, guro@fb.com,
mhocko@kernel.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [patch 07/18] mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:08:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181116230818.7gDYc8ifK%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages
Spock reported that the commit 172b06c32b94 ("mm: slowly shrink slabs with
a relatively small number of objects") leads to a regression on his setup:
periodically the majority of the pagecache is evicted without an obvious
reason, while before the change the amount of free memory was balancing
around the watermark.
The reason behind is that the mentioned above change created some minimal
background pressure on the inode cache. The problem is that if an inode
is considered to be reclaimed, all belonging pagecache page are stripped,
no matter how many of them are there. So, if a huge multi-gigabyte file
is cached in the memory, and the goal is to reclaim only few slab objects
(unused inodes), we still can eventually evict all gigabytes of the
pagecache at once.
The workload described by Spock has few large non-mapped files in the
pagecache, so it's especially noticeable.
To solve the problem let's postpone the reclaim of inodes, which have more
than 1 attached page. Let's wait until the pagecache pages will be
evicted naturally by scanning the corresponding LRU lists, and only then
reclaim the inode structure.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181023164302.20436-1-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reported-by: Spock <dairinin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Spock <dairinin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/fs/inode.c~mm-dont-reclaim-inodes-with-many-attached-pages
+++ a/fs/inode.c
@@ -730,8 +730,11 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate
return LRU_REMOVED;
}
- /* recently referenced inodes get one more pass */
- if (inode->i_state & I_REFERENCED) {
+ /*
+ * Recently referenced inodes and inodes with many attached pages
+ * get one more pass.
+ */
+ if (inode->i_state & I_REFERENCED || inode->i_data.nrpages > 1) {
inode->i_state &= ~I_REFERENCED;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
return LRU_ROTATE;
_
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-17 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 23:08 akpm [this message]
2018-11-16 23:42 ` [patch 07/18] mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181116230818.7gDYc8ifK%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dairinin@gmail.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox