public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	Stefan Chulski <stefanc@marvell.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free()
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:02:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181117220238.1b56e9c2@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15c33e01-b60a-8e74-5399-12e7ca2da8d1@huawei.com>

Hi Marc, Hanjun,

Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> wrote on Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:30:42
+0800:

> Hi Marc, Miquel,
> 
> On 2018/10/12 18:24, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Hi Miquel,
> > 
> > On 11/10/18 10:12, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >> Since the addition of platform MSI support, there were two helpers
> >> supposed to allocate/free IRQs for a device:
> >>
> >>      platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
> >>      platform_msi_domain_free_irqs()
> >>
> >> In these helpers, IRQ descriptors are allocated in the "alloc" routine
> >> while they are freed in the "free" one.
> >>
> >> Later, two other helpers have been added to handle IRQ domains on top
> >> of MSI domains:
> >>
> >>      platform_msi_domain_alloc()
> >>      platform_msi_domain_free()
> >>
> >> Seen from the outside, the logic is pretty close with the former
> >> helpers and people used it with the same logic as before: a
> >> platform_msi_domain_alloc() call should be balanced with a
> >> platform_msi_domain_free() call. While this is probably what was
> >> intended to do, the platform_msi_domain_free() does not remove/free
> >> the IRQ descriptor(s) created/inserted in
> >> platform_msi_domain_alloc().
> >>
> >> One effect of such situation is that removing a module that requested
> >> an IRQ will let one orphaned IRQ descriptor (with an allocated MSI
> >> entry) in the device descriptors list. Next time the module will be
> >> inserted back, one will observe that the allocation will happen twice
> >> in the MSI domain, one time for the remaining descriptor, one time for
> >> the new one. It also has the side effect to quickly overshoot the
> >> maximum number of allocated MSI and then prevent any module requesting
> >> an interrupt in the same domain to be inserted anymore.
> >>
> >> This situation has been met with loops of insertion/removal of the
> >> mvpp2.ko module (requesting 15 MSIs each time).
> >>
> >> Fixes: 552c494a7666 ("platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> > 
> > Thanks for the respin. If nobody disagrees, I'll route this through Thomas to stash into tip, and hopefully have that in 4.19.  
> 
> I didn't see this patch hit mainline, did I miss something?

Indeed, I can't see it neither. Marc, is it possible to have it queued
for your next PR?

Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-18  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11  9:12 [PATCH v2] platform-msi: Free descriptors in platform_msi_domain_free() Miquel Raynal
2018-10-12 10:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-12  3:30   ` Hanjun Guo
2018-11-17 21:02     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2018-12-12 14:33     ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181117220238.1b56e9c2@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox